<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.math Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math</link>
  <description>Mathematical discussions and pursuits.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Biggest mystery, pondering again hostility</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/4fc007bb1bd07f4c/3b27dc511de549eb?show_docid=3b27dc511de549eb</link>
  <description>
  Thanks for the clarification. Regarding arguing both sides I would say &lt;br&gt; that this shows that sometimes people can be mistaken. The consensus &lt;br&gt; is heading towards Arturo&#39;s excellent summary in response to my &lt;br&gt; previous post (which also corrected my spelling speaking of being &lt;br&gt; mistaken). &lt;br&gt; My view for what it&#39;s worth is that your axiom is a specific case of
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/4fc007bb1bd07f4c/3b27dc511de549eb?show_docid=3b27dc511de549eb</guid>
  <author>
  ms...@tpg.com.au
  (MichaelW)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 03:38:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Good Point by JSH</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/53904ebaa41cdf9d?show_docid=53904ebaa41cdf9d</link>
  <description>
  perhaps, his initial proof was only for odd prime exponents, &lt;br&gt; is what I am saying. perhaps, he had an insight &lt;br&gt; into what were later to be known as p-adics (which, &lt;br&gt; of course, were part of the subjectum of the conference &lt;br&gt; at which Wiles exposed his Secret Attic Proof .-) &lt;br&gt; thus: &lt;br&gt; Harry couldn&#39;t have died on the 7th film, because, iff
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/53904ebaa41cdf9d?show_docid=53904ebaa41cdf9d</guid>
  <author>
  space...@hotmail.com
  (spudnik)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 03:27:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Satisfying Cardons&#39; impossible quadratic equation.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/bb595de5b40019c7/51384a9eda01dee0?show_docid=51384a9eda01dee0</link>
  <description>
  Rewriting my first quadratic example to conform &lt;br&gt; to the rest I am showing below --- &lt;br&gt; x^2 - 10x = - 40 &lt;br&gt; ------------------------------ ----- &lt;br&gt; x^2 - 10x = 40 - ((10/2)^2) = 15+ 40 = 55 &lt;br&gt; -x = ((sqrt((55*4)+2)) -2)/2 = 6.4498322128... + (10/2) = - &lt;br&gt; 11.4498322128... &lt;br&gt; -x^2 = ((((11.4498322128...*2)+2)^2) -2)/4 = - 154.49832212...
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/bb595de5b40019c7/51384a9eda01dee0?show_docid=51384a9eda01dee0</guid>
  <author>
  fasttrac...@att.net
  (Danny73)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 02:23:14 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Biggest mystery, pondering again hostility</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/4fc007bb1bd07f4c/5d040ca03d77448d?show_docid=5d040ca03d77448d</link>
  <description>
  Twin primes proof follows with a short argument from the prime residue &lt;br&gt; axiom. &lt;br&gt; Actually I separated out the prime distribution, which makes for a &lt;br&gt; simpler twin primes probability calculation! &lt;br&gt; The prime distribution is NOT random, so there has been confusion when &lt;br&gt; it is mixed in with twin primes, like by working with the twin primes
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/4fc007bb1bd07f4c/5d040ca03d77448d?show_docid=5d040ca03d77448d</guid>
  <author>
  jst...@gmail.com
  (JSH)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 02:21:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Good Point by JSH</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/42abaa438f7efe27?show_docid=42abaa438f7efe27</link>
  <description>
  Fixing crossposting: &lt;br&gt; Somehow, this fails to seem like an argument for the proposition that &lt;br&gt; he did have a proof of the general case, despite you starting by &lt;br&gt; denying my statement to the contrary. &lt;br&gt; He made personal note that he had no reason to believe would ever &lt;br&gt; become public (it would not have become, but for his son publishing
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/42abaa438f7efe27?show_docid=42abaa438f7efe27</guid>
  <author>
  magi...@member.ams.org
  (Arturo Magidin)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 02:07:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>1.75 PRIMALITY DIVISOR , IS DESIGNED TO SELECT PRIME FROM NON PRIME IN THE 36SET SIEVE POSTED EARLIER</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/25c24239687710c7/987d7519852ee166?show_docid=987d7519852ee166</link>
  <description>
  The 36 set sieve isolates all primes and pseudo primes, so far it &lt;br&gt; seems that this differentiates and we can build up the sets of primes &lt;br&gt; completly because all other numbers are sieved out. It is NOT a &lt;br&gt; primary sieve for primality, which may come. &lt;br&gt; Understand that we did not have a chance to thoroughly check this
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/25c24239687710c7/987d7519852ee166?show_docid=987d7519852ee166</guid>
  <author>
  hope9...@verizon.net
  (Inverse 19 mathematics)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 01:38:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: *** *** Re: India - beggar nation, biggest recipient of foreign aid ever</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2328f3fe4ab3daef/4850d2ad97ab9949?show_docid=4850d2ad97ab9949</link>
  <description>
  Which &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; are you talking about? &lt;br&gt; Quite frankly and after (I&#39;m retired now) a career in professional &lt;br&gt; science, including publishing in peer-reviewed journals in my &lt;br&gt; specialization, I can tell you that if you have a wacky-idea, it&#39;s going &lt;br&gt; to get rejected. I can also tell you that if you have a good idea, it
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2328f3fe4ab3daef/4850d2ad97ab9949?show_docid=4850d2ad97ab9949</guid>
  <author>
  a...@hotmail.com
  (harmony)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 01:33:24 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Why fame is lame</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1550c4e544bea1a/c29292d43a233b20?show_docid=c29292d43a233b20</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hn9d07$ee...@news.albasani.ne t&amp;gt;, nos...@invalid.com says... &lt;br&gt; Sometimes he says something that is true, but it was known centuries &lt;br&gt; ago. &lt;br&gt; So I will beat him to the punch: &lt;br&gt; I have discovered that counting numbers have something called a &lt;br&gt; successor if we add a unit to them and we will end up with a larger
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1550c4e544bea1a/c29292d43a233b20?show_docid=c29292d43a233b20</guid>
  <author>
  dcor...@connx.com
  (Dann Corbit)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 01:07:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/fbc1f184166f1ac9?show_docid=fbc1f184166f1ac9</link>
  <description>
  For a photon when the photon wave interacts with the detection screen &lt;br&gt; the photon collapses and is detected as a quantum of mather. The &lt;br&gt; ability of the photon to collapse and be detected as a quantum of &lt;br&gt; mather travels a single path. However, this path the photon &#39;particle&#39; &lt;br&gt; travel also consists of an associated aether wave which interference
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/fbc1f184166f1ac9?show_docid=fbc1f184166f1ac9</guid>
  <author>
  mpc...@gmail.com
  (mpc755)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 01:03:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/9b78dba8f8eb17a9?show_docid=9b78dba8f8eb17a9</link>
  <description>
  But the wave for matter can go away at the dection screen. &lt;br&gt; Mitch Raemsch
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/9b78dba8f8eb17a9?show_docid=9b78dba8f8eb17a9</guid>
  <author>
  macromi...@yahoo.com
  (BURT)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 00:53:35 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: There is no “pull” of gravity, only the PUSH of flowing ether!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/68c57fc44c6aa76e?show_docid=68c57fc44c6aa76e</link>
  <description>
  Push is the real thing. &lt;br&gt; Mitch Raemsch
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/faba95ec4697f5c6/68c57fc44c6aa76e?show_docid=68c57fc44c6aa76e</guid>
  <author>
  macromi...@yahoo.com
  (BURT)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 00:46:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: NEW SIMPLE PRIMALITY TEST FROM &quot;INVERSE 19 MATHEMATICS&quot;</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ec8f2cda950257d4/22a418b0e2135be0?show_docid=22a418b0e2135be0</link>
  <description>
  If he was your friend you should know what his title was and how to &lt;br&gt; spell his name.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/ec8f2cda950257d4/22a418b0e2135be0?show_docid=22a418b0e2135be0</guid>
  <author>
  frederick.willia...@tesco.net
  (Frederick Williams)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 00:31:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/b50a665adf633508?show_docid=b50a665adf633508</link>
  <description>
  Agree, caribou and fleas is good. &lt;br&gt; and Yes, Musatov is far more famous in higher circles, for far less &lt;br&gt; compedient work than JSH. &lt;br&gt; But we are comparing two Bozos in the Dark with squirt guns and weak minds.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/b50a665adf633508?show_docid=b50a665adf633508</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@invalid.com
  (harry)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 00:25:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Why fame is lame</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1550c4e544bea1a/ed7080b1cd55b548?show_docid=ed7080b1cd55b548</link>
  <description>
  that could be true, unless JSH states that he lies, but I don&#39;t think he &lt;br&gt; ever has said that, so this new Axiom holds. &lt;br&gt; The newly discovered but obvious, JSH Axiom =&amp;gt; JSH is ALWAYS lying.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a1550c4e544bea1a/ed7080b1cd55b548?show_docid=ed7080b1cd55b548</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@invalid.com
  (harry)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 00:20:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/312effdb8299c921?show_docid=312effdb8299c921</link>
  <description>
  Nice site lyndon laroush and science
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.jo/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/312effdb8299c921?show_docid=312effdb8299c921</guid>
  <author>
  nos...@invalid.com
  (harry)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 مارس 2010 00:17:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
